Earth Sciences Division Logo
Resource Departments
Research Programs
Other Resources
ESD Home
Berkeley Lab Home Page
Berkeley Lab Logo
Geochemistry Department Staff CIG Publications Geochemistry Facilities Geochemistry Department Home Page Center for Isotope Geochemistry Home Page

Geothermal Resources:
Isotopes in Geothermal Research

Collaborators

(1) Prof. Donald J. DePaolo, Univesity of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

(2) D. Shuster, Center for Isotope Geochemistry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

(3) Alfred H. Truedsell, Consultant, Menlo Park, CA.

(4) Dr. J. N. Moore, Energy and Geoscience Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.

(5) Kathy Janik, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

(6) Dick Benoit, Oxbow Power Servies Inc., Reno, NV.

(7) Prof. Zhao Ping, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China

(8) Dr. Mayflor Ramos-Candelaria, PNOC Energy Development Corporation, Philippines

An integrated isotopic approach can provide needed information to geothermal industry regarding:

  • The sources of geothermal fluids and heat
  • The spatial distribution of fluid types
  • Subsurface fluid low directions and paths
  • The physio-chemical processes effecting fluid composition, e.g. water-rock reaction paths and rates and
  • The temporal evolution of geothermal systems.

The isotopic compositions of elements in geothermal fluids provide a quantitative measure of material balance and can be applied to fluid samples from production wells, hydrothermal and non-thermal springs, fumaroles, etc., fluid inclusions in rocks and minerals, as well as the host rocks and minerals themselves.

The isotopic compositions of elements in a fluid moving through the crust will be modified in space and time in response to varying chemical and physical parameters and/or by mixing with other fluids. During this process, elements will either be conserved, thus preserving isotopic information related to initial conditions and sources, or modified in a fashion that is diagnostic of chemical reactions along a flow path.

A. Conservative Elements:

  • Noble gases (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) are definitive tracers for heat and fluid sources. For instance, the isotopic composition of helium in the Earth's mantle is ~1000 times greater than that in the Earth's crust.

(3He/4He)Mantle = ~10-5
(3He/4He)Cruat = ~ 10-8

B. Non-Conservative or Reactive Elements:

  • Fractionating elements (H, C, O, and N) are elements whose isotopic composition can be modified by chemical reactions involving the breakdown of chemical bonds, electron transfer, etc. or by phase change (e.g. boiling, condensation). These elements can provide useful information regarding the source of recharge (meteoric) fluids, water/rock ratios, chemical equilibration temperatures, etc.
  • Non-fractionating elements (e.g. Sr, Nd, Pb, U, etc) are too heavy for chemical reactions or phase changes to have a significant impact on their isotopic compositions (also any natural fractionation that has occurred will be lost to normalization procedures used in the isotopic measurement). However, their isotopic compositions in fluids can be altered by fluid-rock exchange via dissolution/precipitation. The evolution of their isotopic compositions in fluids can provide insight into chemical reaction rates and paths and fluid flow directions and velocities.

I. Using Isotopes to Determine Fluid Velocities and Flow Pathways From Water-Rock Interactions

Isotopic measurements are increasingly used for hydrologic characterization in groundwater systems. Values of d18O and dD vary with time and space in the precipitation at recharge areas, and the isotope ratios of dissolved elements (e.g. C, S, Sr, Nd, Pb, U) are influenced by the rock the waters pass through. The resulting isotopic contrasts give rise to spatial and/or temporal patterns in isotope ratios that contain information about fluid flow paths, water-rock interaction, and mixing relationships. This approach has been used in hydrologic studies from the catchment to the regional scale.

The isotope ratios of "non-fractionating" elements (e.g. Sr, Nd, Pb) in solution deposited minerals are always equal to those of the parent water; thus directly recording water conditions at the time of precipitation. On the other hand, isotope ratios of "fractionating" elements (e.g. H, C, O) record the isotope ratios of the parent fluid, modified by temperature-dependent fractionation.

The isotopic ratios of both non-fractionating and fractionating elements in groundwater at any point along a fluid flow path will be the product of the isotopic composition of the original fluid and that of the solute acquired from the host rock. Therefore, isotope ratio measurements, either on sampled groundwater or water-deposited minerals, yield spatial or temporal patterns that contain information concerning groundwater flow and transport conditions.

Figure 1: The figure on the left (1a) is a schematic representation of a "fast path" or preferential flow zone as revealed by an isotope exchange front propagating through an aquifer. The exchange front propogates down-gradient and moves faster in zones of higher conductivity (faster fluid flow). In the figure on the left (1b), fluid conductivity contours for the Snake River Plain Aquifer are mapped by strontium isotopic composition contours. The aquifer (low 87Sr/86Sr) is recharged by groundwater coming of the mountains (high 87Sr/86Sr) in the northwest.

Radiogenic helium (4He) in groundwater is a special case for the reaction-transport models. Unlike other element systems, the radiogenic 4He accumulates in the fluid phase because the flux of helium from the fluid back to the host rock is neglible (helium is chemically inert). And in steady-state, the 4He accumulation rate does not depend on water-rock reaction rates, but is equivalent to the whole rock production rate which is readily calculated from the host rock U and Th concentrations. Therefore, along a fluid flow path a helium concentration gradient will be established which provides an estimate of fluid age and velocity.

As fluid containing mantle helium flows through the crust, the elevated 3He/4He ratio (elevated because of the mantle 3He contribution) will become diluted with the accumulating radiogenic 4He produced locally in the host rocks. The resulting gradient in helium isotopic composition along the fluid flow path will be a function of the fluid velocity and 4He-production rate.

Helium isotopic compositions in fluids associated with the San Andreas Fault in central California vary from ~0.1 Ra to 4.0 Ra (Figure 2). Assuming the elevated 3He/4He ratios reflect a flux of mantle volatile through the fault zone and scaling to the thickness of the brittle crust, fluid flow rates through the fautl of 1-10 mm/yr have been estimated (provide link to Link #2).

Figure 2: Helium isotopic composition (R) normalized to the ratio in air (Ra) plotted as a function of approximate distance from the main strike of the SAF. Associated fluid flow rates (q) and mantle contributions are also indicated.

II. Noble Gas Concentrations and Isotopic Abundances as Natural Tracers for Fluid Origins and Reservoir Processes

The noble gases are excellent natural tracers for fluid origins and reservoir processes:

1. They are chemically inert and, therefore, conserved in water-rock systems.

2. There are five stable noble gas elements (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) providing 23 different isotopes spanning a mass range from 3 to 136 amu.

3. They are moderately soluble in water and their solubility in water as a function of temperature is known up to the critical point for water.

4. There are three natural terrestrial "reservoirs" (mantle, crust, atmo-hydrosphere) each characterized by a distinct noble gas isotopic and elemental composition.

Natural Terrestrial Reservoirs and Important Isotopic Distinctions

A. The Earth's Mantle: The Earth's mantle is believed to be partially or non-degassed and therefore is enriched in an indigenous or primordial noble gas component that was inherited from meteoritic material through accretion during Earth formation. The noble gas composition of the present day mantle reservoir is defined by the compositions of Mid-Ocean Ridge (MORB) and Ocean Island Basalts (OIB):

  • 3He/4He = 1.2 Ð 4.8 x 10-5 [9 (MORB)-32 (OIB) times the ratio in air]
  • 4He/36Ar >>> the ratio in air
  • 40Ar/36Ar > 40,000 (>135 times the ratio in air)
  • Radiogenic 40Ar/4He ~ 0.27 (function of the mantle K/(U+Th) ratio)
  • Solar neon + Nucleogenic 21Ne [from 18O(a,n)21Ne nuclear reactions]
  • 3He/CO2 ~ 5 x 10-10

B. The Earth's Crust: The processes involved in the formation of Earth's continental and oceanic crusts result in a general enrichment of incompatible lithophile elements such as K, U and Th, a depletion of noble gases, and therefore a concomitant enrichment in the K/Ar, and (U+Th)/He ratios. Therefore old crustal materials tend to be enriched in radiogenic (produced by decay of naturally occurring radioactive isotopes, e.g. 40K, and the isotopes of U and Th) and nucleogenic (produced by nuclear interactions induced by natural radioactivity) noble gases. A theoretical composition of crustal noble gases can be calculated from nuclear theory using an average crustal elemental composition. The theoretical calculations have been confirmed by noble gas isotope and abundance measurements of hydrocarbon fluids from crustal regions void of any recent magmatic/volcanic/mantle involvement.

  • 3He/4He ~ 3 x 10-8 (~0.02 times the ratio in air)
  • 4He/36Ar = depends on the age of the crustal source
  • 40Ar/36Ar = depends on the age of the crustal source
  • Radiogenic 40Ar/4He
  • Nucleogenic 21Ne [produced from 18O(a,n)21Ne nuclear reactions]
  • Nucleogenic 21Ne/4He ~ 5 Ð10 x 10-8

C. The Atmo-Hydrosphere: To first order the composition of the atmo-hydrosphere represents an integrated mixture of noble gases degassed from the mantle and crust over 4.5 billion years of Earth history. The one exception is the atmospheric abundance of helium. Because helium is very light, it's isotopes are not bound by the Earth's gravitational field. Therefore, the atmosphere is strongly depleted with respect to helium relative to the other noble gases. By convention the elemental and isotopic composition of noble gases in the atmopshere are used as a standard for normalizing noble gas data. The concentrations of noble gases dissolved in water in equilibrium with air are determined by their temperature dependent solubility. Temperature dependent noble gas solubilities in water have been experimentally determined up to the critical point.

  • 3He/4He = 1.4 x 10-6
  • 4He/36Ar = 0.167 (<< crust or mantle)
  • 40Ar/36Ar = 296
  • Noble gas concentrations in water determined by temperature dependent solubility (Xe>Kr>Ar>Ne~He)

The influence of these three distinct reservoirs on the composition of noble gases in geothermal reservoirs is summarized in the figure below. Helium isotopic compositions (R) are given in units of Ra, the 3He/4He ratio in air. Helium relative abundances are given as F(4He) values, which are fractionation factors relative to atmospheric composition: F(4He) = (4He/36Ar)reservoir/(4He/36Ar)air.

Figure 3: A geothermal reservoir fluid contains noble gases from a variety of sources. Each source is characterized by a unique noble gas composition and contributions to a geothermal reservoir can be easily identified. For instance, magmatic fluids have large 4He excesses [F(4He) >>> ASW (air saturated water)], with a 4He/4He ratio (R) up to 9 times the ratio in air (Ra), and Heat to He ratios (Q/3He) of ~ 2 Joules/cc. Whereas, the helium in crustal fluids will have a 3He/4He ratio of ~0.02 Ra and Q/3He ~ 1000 Joules/cc.

Geothermal reservoirs recharged by natural meteoric waters will have noble gas concentrations and relative abundances equivalent to air-saturated water (ASW). Flashed brines used for re-injection into the system can be easily identified by noble gas concentrations up to ~100 times lower than the natural recharge waters.

Heat and Helium

Geothermal systems hosted in continental crust exhibit a wide range in 3He/4He ratios. There is evidence that the range may reflect variations in the contributions from different heat sources.

Figure 4: The helium isotopic composition (R/Ra) in geothermal fluids reflects a variation in the heat source, with average crust as one end-member and the mantle (MORB) as the other.

There is a unique coherence between Heat and Helium in the Earth.

U and Th decay account for 75% of the heat production in the Earth:

238U 206Pb + 8(4He) + Heat
235U 207Pb + 7(4He) + Heat
232Th 208Pb + 6(4He) + Heat

For Mantle (MORB) U+Th concentrations:

4He/Q = 3.7 x 10-8 cm3STP/Joule
3He/Q = 0.5 x 10-12 cm3STP/Joule (8.8 Ra)

For Crustal U+Th concentrations

4He/Q = 3.7 x 10-8 cm3STP/Joule
3He/Q = 1.0 x 10-15 cm3STP/Joule (0.02 Ra)

Figure 5: Helium and Heat are uniquely coupled because ~75% of the Earth's heat budget is from the natural radioactive decay of uranium and thorium, thus leading to well defined 4He/3He and Q(heat)/3He ratios in mantle and crustal fluids (green triangles).

  • Using this coherence, the heat source and content of a geothermal reservoir can be evaluated. For instance, ~10-15% of the heat (~95% of the 3He) in the Beowave and Dixie Valley geothermal reservoirs is mantle derived. Whereas, the heat content in systems such as the Northwest Geysers and Waiotapu is ~100% mantle derived.
  • Heat loss by conduction, fluid mixing or by boiling will shift the helium isotopic compositions and Heat/3He ratios i n the residual fluids in predictable ways allowing the present state of a geothermal reservoir to be ascertained.

Noble Gases: Tracers For Natural Recharge and Injectate Fluids

Noble Gas Solubility in Water

The solubility of noble gases in water (fresh and NaCl brines) have been determined by numerous workers. Typically, the solubility is given as a Henry's Constant [KH(i,T)] solubility that relates the mole fraction concentration of species "i" in water (xi.l) to the partial pressure of "i" [P(i)] in equilibrium with water:

P(i) = KH(i,T)xi,l

Henry's Constants for noble gases in fresh water can be calculated from empirical equations published by several authors.

Figure 6: (a) Absolute noble gas solubility in fresh water as a function of temperature. (b) Relative noble gas solublities in fresh water as a function of temperature.

Phase Separation: Noble gases as tracers for re-injected brines in geothermal reservoirs.

Because noble gases have very low solubility in fresh water, particularly at high temperatures (T > 150 ¡C), phase separation (e.g. boiling) will generate a residual liquid that is strongly depleted in noble gases and the relative noble gas composition will be fractionated relative to the original fluid composition. Two examples of phase separation showing the effect of phase separation on the composition of a residual fluid are shown in Figure 7 below.

Figure 7: Residual liquid compositions generated by batch phase separation and gas loss. The red dashed line depicts the composition of a residual liquid which has lost gas in two stages: gas and steam removal after boiling from 230 Ð 150 ¡C followed by a second stage of gas removal after boiling from 150 Ð 100 ¡C. The blue dashed line depicts the composition of a residual liquid which lost gas and steam in a single isothermal step. The numbers along the blue dashed line are the mass fraction of steam produced. In both cases, 20 ¡C air saturated water was used for the original fluid composition.

The very low solubility of noble gases in water make them very sensitive natural tracers for monitoring the return of cooler re-injected production fluids in geothermal reservoirs. Typically, the brines residual to steam flashing and power production are re-injected into or near the geothermal production reservoir for environmental reasons and to increase the longevity of the geothermal field. However, the invasion of cooler re-injected brines will lower the power capacity of the geothermal reservoir. Therefore, field management and production strategies need a reliable and sensitive tracer for monitoring the break-through of re-injected fluids.

The concentrations of noble gases in the residual brines will be extremely depleted relative to the original reservoir fluid. Note that with a steam fraction of only 2.5%, the residual liquid is depleted in 36Ar by a factor of ~20.

If production fluids can be shown to be a mixture of natural groundwaters (e.g air saturated water) and re-injected brine (Figure 8), accurate proportions of injectate in the production stream can be easily calculated and monitored (Figure 9).

Figure 8: Demonstration of the utility of using noble gases as tracers for re-injected brine at the Dixie Valley Geothermal Field. The red and blue curves are the same as in Figure 6 depicting the composition of liquids residual to phase separation and gas loss. The green square is the measured composition of the brine re-injected into an aquifer south of the Dixie Valley reservoir. The open circles represent the composition of fluids produced from the southern section of the field. The compositions conform to a mixing line drawn through the re-injected brine composition and 25 ¡C air saturated water.

Figure 9: The volume fraction of injectate fluid calculated from the 36Abundances assuming that the produced fluid represent mixtures of 25 ¡C air saturated water and the re-injected brine.




Related Publications

Johnson, T.M. and D.J. DePaolo, Interpretation of isotopic data in groundwater-rock systems: model development and application to Sr isotopic data from Yucca Mountain: Water Resources Res., v. 30, p.1571-1587 (1994)

DePaolo, D.J. and S.R. Getty, Models of isotopic exchange in reactive fluid-rock systems: Implications for geochronology in metamorphic rocks: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta v. 60, no. 20, 3933-3947 (1996)

Kennedy, B.M. et al., Mantle fluids in the San andreas fault system, California: Science 278, 1278-1281 (1997).

Kennedy, B.M. and Truesdell, A.H. (1996). The Northwest Geysers high-temperature reservoir: Evidence for active magmatic degassing and implications for the origin of The Geysers Geothermal Field. Geothermics, 25, 365-387.

Kennedy et al. (1999). Natural geochemical tracers for injectate fluids at Dixie Valley. Proc. 24th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 24, 108-113.

Funding Source

These projects are supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Geothermal and Wind Technologies of the US Department of Energy (html site) and the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Engineering, and Geosciences Division of the U.S. Department of Energy (http://www.eren.doe.gov/geothermal/).

Related Web Sites

The Geothermal Resource council: http://www.geothermal.org/
Stanford Geothermal Program: http://ekofisk.stanford.edu/geotherm.html
LBNL Geothermal Program: http://www-esd.lbl.gov/ER/geothermal.shtml


Back to Top of Page